<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solving Our Water Woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=solving-our-water-woes</link>
	<description>Beyond the Rows is a Monsanto Company blog focused on agriculture. Monsanto employees write about Monsanto’s business, agriculture, biotechnology, and the farmer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jg</title>
		<link>http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>jg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.monsantoblog.com/?p=1084#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Bailey,
I am not so sure about the open a respectful dialogue especially when you are talking to ‘antis’.  ( I don’t even think it matters what they are against –pick any hot topic of the day.) It is very difficult to have great dialogue when people are so set one their position they cannot listen and the people shouting the loudest seem to have some agenda.  It is also easy to spread and buy into shocking roomers.  I am very disheartened there is so much fear of the worst case scenario that will never happen and misinformation being spread around. I do know at Monsanto, where there is a possible problem, the company studies it, addresses it and makes sure nothing is harmful.  I have seen this happen many times.  By the time the ‘answer’ comes out no one cares (or no one cares to remember the good outcome.) And the reality is Monsanto has no use for bad or harmful products, so everything in tested before it is launched as a product. I am finding that nearly all the things people fear about Monsanto are concerns raised 10 -30 years ago and have been addressed and found that there is no need for concern anymore and findings tend to show extra benefits, like positive environmental impacts.

I am always a bit skeptical myself.  So, I try to find good sources of factual information.  I find government agency websites to be good internet sources – USDA, CDC, EPA etc- although they can be difficult to navigate.  It is also good to get some historical perspective.  People forget (or never knew) that agricultural technology prevents famine and has for centuries.  Check out your school library for books on agricultural practices and journal review articles on the subject.  Look for subjects like agricultural economics and agricultural pest management. Look for peer reviewed and college textbook type resources. One great thing about being in college is you have access to all kind of very good information.  And, when you are not in college, you can visit your local library or university library (state colleges), or extension office to get this type of information. Maybe even try the library of Congress online.

I know I did not answer your question.  This blog page has a few other blog sites Monsanto recommends. I have spent a little time browsing them.  They seem to me to have positive tones, which, to me, is refreshing.  And personally, I like Monsanto’s blog a lot; the facts are sound.

BTW, I think you have a wise Dad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bailey,<br />
I am not so sure about the open a respectful dialogue especially when you are talking to ‘antis’.  ( I don’t even think it matters what they are against –pick any hot topic of the day.) It is very difficult to have great dialogue when people are so set one their position they cannot listen and the people shouting the loudest seem to have some agenda.  It is also easy to spread and buy into shocking roomers.  I am very disheartened there is so much fear of the worst case scenario that will never happen and misinformation being spread around. I do know at Monsanto, where there is a possible problem, the company studies it, addresses it and makes sure nothing is harmful.  I have seen this happen many times.  By the time the ‘answer’ comes out no one cares (or no one cares to remember the good outcome.) And the reality is Monsanto has no use for bad or harmful products, so everything in tested before it is launched as a product. I am finding that nearly all the things people fear about Monsanto are concerns raised 10 -30 years ago and have been addressed and found that there is no need for concern anymore and findings tend to show extra benefits, like positive environmental impacts.</p>
<p>I am always a bit skeptical myself.  So, I try to find good sources of factual information.  I find government agency websites to be good internet sources – USDA, CDC, EPA etc- although they can be difficult to navigate.  It is also good to get some historical perspective.  People forget (or never knew) that agricultural technology prevents famine and has for centuries.  Check out your school library for books on agricultural practices and journal review articles on the subject.  Look for subjects like agricultural economics and agricultural pest management. Look for peer reviewed and college textbook type resources. One great thing about being in college is you have access to all kind of very good information.  And, when you are not in college, you can visit your local library or university library (state colleges), or extension office to get this type of information. Maybe even try the library of Congress online.</p>
<p>I know I did not answer your question.  This blog page has a few other blog sites Monsanto recommends. I have spent a little time browsing them.  They seem to me to have positive tones, which, to me, is refreshing.  And personally, I like Monsanto’s blog a lot; the facts are sound.</p>
<p>BTW, I think you have a wise Dad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.monsantoblog.com/?p=1084#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>Hey guys,

I don&#039;t have a specific comment about this post as much as I have a sort of general question about getting in contact with you guys (my interest was piqued by reading Jeff&#039;s post, &quot;I Am Monsanto&quot; - unfortunately, I couldn&#039;t post a comment there, so I&#039;ll try here!)

I am currently a chemical &amp; biological engineering student at the University of Colorado in Boulder, CO. Naturally, given the demographic and my discipline, I have heard a lot about Monsanto. Indeed, what I have heard, read, and watched has been a little scary, but my father always taught me to be wary of extremists in any form. With politics - or, in this case, social/ethical issues leveraging some degree of political weight - I tend to be more aligned with the left, so I try to be particularly wary of leftist &quot;propaganda&quot;; we are all human, of course, so I can only assume that I&#039;m probably more prone to buy into a story that parallels (perhaps threatens?) my own beliefs more readily than one that does not.

Probably naturally, my first reaction to all of the negative information that I&#039;ve absorbed regarding Monsanto was anger, disgust, sadness, frustration, etc. I even considered making a t-shirt for about five minutes that said &quot;F*** Monsanto&quot; (I&#039;m giggling at the pettiness - and humanness! - of this now). But, come on! What good would that have done?

Plus, as an engineer myself, I all but have to bow to the kinds of feats Monsanto has and can continue to accomplish. I am familiar with - and excited by! - the kinds of agricultural benefits that we, as engineers, can manifest; they are enormous, and can do a lot of good in the world , given a few healthy parameters, of course. Monsanto is in a powerful position to do an unparalleled amount of good; frankly, I would like NOT to believe the kinds of things being said about the company. That being said, however, I do know that, often, extremist information presented through any medium is based, to a certain extent, in fact.

I have since tempered that internal storm, taken my dad&#039;s old adage to heart, and am now posting here because I haven&#039;t yet given you guys a chance. In my mind, the jury is still out on Monsanto. Though what I have seen has illustrated Monsanto in a heavily negative light, my ears and eyes remain open. After all, no reasonable conclusion is ever really met without getting both sides of the story.

The question, then, is where can we have this open, respectful dialogue? I&#039;ll be waiting with much anticipation!

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a specific comment about this post as much as I have a sort of general question about getting in contact with you guys (my interest was piqued by reading Jeff&#8217;s post, &#8220;I Am Monsanto&#8221; &#8211; unfortunately, I couldn&#8217;t post a comment there, so I&#8217;ll try here!)</p>
<p>I am currently a chemical &amp; biological engineering student at the University of Colorado in Boulder, CO. Naturally, given the demographic and my discipline, I have heard a lot about Monsanto. Indeed, what I have heard, read, and watched has been a little scary, but my father always taught me to be wary of extremists in any form. With politics &#8211; or, in this case, social/ethical issues leveraging some degree of political weight &#8211; I tend to be more aligned with the left, so I try to be particularly wary of leftist &#8220;propaganda&#8221;; we are all human, of course, so I can only assume that I&#8217;m probably more prone to buy into a story that parallels (perhaps threatens?) my own beliefs more readily than one that does not.</p>
<p>Probably naturally, my first reaction to all of the negative information that I&#8217;ve absorbed regarding Monsanto was anger, disgust, sadness, frustration, etc. I even considered making a t-shirt for about five minutes that said &#8220;F*** Monsanto&#8221; (I&#8217;m giggling at the pettiness &#8211; and humanness! &#8211; of this now). But, come on! What good would that have done?</p>
<p>Plus, as an engineer myself, I all but have to bow to the kinds of feats Monsanto has and can continue to accomplish. I am familiar with &#8211; and excited by! &#8211; the kinds of agricultural benefits that we, as engineers, can manifest; they are enormous, and can do a lot of good in the world , given a few healthy parameters, of course. Monsanto is in a powerful position to do an unparalleled amount of good; frankly, I would like NOT to believe the kinds of things being said about the company. That being said, however, I do know that, often, extremist information presented through any medium is based, to a certain extent, in fact.</p>
<p>I have since tempered that internal storm, taken my dad&#8217;s old adage to heart, and am now posting here because I haven&#8217;t yet given you guys a chance. In my mind, the jury is still out on Monsanto. Though what I have seen has illustrated Monsanto in a heavily negative light, my ears and eyes remain open. After all, no reasonable conclusion is ever really met without getting both sides of the story.</p>
<p>The question, then, is where can we have this open, respectful dialogue? I&#8217;ll be waiting with much anticipation!</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.monsantoblog.com/?p=1084#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>Tyler,
Thanks for reading the blog post on the need for water.

In mining, selenium comes to the surface in waste rock. If not controlled properly, it can combine with oxygen and water, then water can carry it from the mine site. This issue affects all phosphate mines in the West in one way or another.  As our understanding of the movement of selenium has developed, Monsanto has been working with the EPA, Idaho state officials and mining experts to find the best solutions to protect water quality. We are focused on resolving the cases you speak of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler,<br />
Thanks for reading the blog post on the need for water.</p>
<p>In mining, selenium comes to the surface in waste rock. If not controlled properly, it can combine with oxygen and water, then water can carry it from the mine site. This issue affects all phosphate mines in the West in one way or another.  As our understanding of the movement of selenium has developed, Monsanto has been working with the EPA, Idaho state officials and mining experts to find the best solutions to protect water quality. We are focused on resolving the cases you speak of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.monsantoblog.com/2009/08/11/solving-our-water-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.monsantoblog.com/?p=1084#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>This is a well timed blog post since only a few days ago the AP reported three Monsanto mines are under superfund authority for polluting the waters of Idaho, with a fourth severely violating the clean water act.

http://www.whec.com/article/stories/S1074410.shtml?cat=588</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a well timed blog post since only a few days ago the AP reported three Monsanto mines are under superfund authority for polluting the waters of Idaho, with a fourth severely violating the clean water act.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whec.com/article/stories/S1074410.shtml?cat=588" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.whec.com/article/stories/S1074410.shtml?cat=588</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
